GRC Review
Risk Management

Drata alternatives for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 (compared)

Buyers looking past Drata are typically priced out of its fully custom, quote-only contracts—which commonly start at $10,000–$15,000 per year—or are early-stage teams that find its 2–4 week onboarding and broad feature surface more than they need for a first SOC 2 Type I. A smaller segment are budget-constrained seed-stage companies or European organizations whose compliance needs don't map cleanly to Drata's startup-centric positioning. Most switchers end up at either a flat-fee GRC platform like Eramba (lowest total cost, multi-framework) or a closer feature-for-feature alternative like StandardFusion for teams that still want an auditor portal and automated evidence collection without Drata's opaque pricing.

Top pick: Eramba 11 alternatives ranked
GRC Review editorial desk · · AI-assisted draft, human-checked. Methodology

Why buyers look past Drata

Reasons buyers switch

  • Pricing is fully custom across all tiers with no published rates, making it impossible to budget before engaging sales and creating an asymmetric negotiation—a real friction point for founders modeling costs into a seed or Series A financial plan.
  • Onboarding requires 2–4 weeks of upfront configuration, which disqualifies Drata for teams that need to move quickly or are already mid-audit-cycle.
  • Very small teams (under 15 employees) pursuing only SOC 2 Type I often pay for continuous monitoring, vendor risk workflows, and multi-framework mapping they won't use for 12–18 months, making lighter-weight tools a better value.
  • Teams with data-residency requirements or a preference for on-premise deployment cannot use Drata, which is SaaS-only with no self-hosted option.
  • Organizations outside the AWS/GitHub/Okta/Google Workspace stack may find Drata's native integrations less compelling, reducing the automation advantage that justifies its price premium.

What a replacement has to do

  • Pre-built control libraries for SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria and ISO 27001:2022 Annex A, so you're not mapping controls from scratch before your first audit.
  • Native automated evidence collection from your actual infrastructure stack (AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace) to avoid manual evidence gathering that defeats the purpose of a compliance platform.
  • An auditor collaboration portal or structured evidence-sharing mechanism that reduces back-and-forth email during fieldwork—critical for compressing SOC 2 Type II audit timelines.
  • Transparent or at least predictable pricing that lets a technical founder or ops lead model annual compliance costs without a multi-week sales cycle.
  • Low admin overhead for a team under 50 people—opinionated workflows and pre-built templates matter more than infinite configurability when no one owns compliance full-time.

Where Drata still fits best: Series A startups preparing for SOC 2 Type II who need to demonstrate continuous compliance to enterprise customers, not just a point-in-time audit report.; Companies that need both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 simultaneously and want to avoid managing two separate control environments..

Ranked alternatives

1

Eramba Top pick

Pick Eramba if you want the lowest total annual cost for multi-framework GRC (SOC 2 plus ISO 27001) and have an engineer or security-minded founder willing to invest 4–6 weeks of setup time in exchange for a flat $5,000/year fee with no per-user or per-framework charges.

From €5,000 / year 4/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Flat $5,000/year Enterprise pricing with unlimited users, frameworks, and modules eliminates the scaling cost that makes Drata expensive as headcount grows—a direct, quantifiable saving of $5,000–$10,000+ annually for most seed-stage teams.
  • On-premise deployment option at no additional cost tier addresses data-residency requirements that Drata's SaaS-only model cannot satisfy.
  • Community edition is a fully functional free tier—not a trial—giving pre-audit startups a genuine zero-cost entry point to build a compliance program before committing budget.

Trade-off

No native pre-built integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Google Workspace; automated evidence collection requires API work or custom automation, which adds engineering overhead that Drata eliminates.

Price

$5,000/year flat for Enterprise (unlimited users); Community edition is free. Drata starts at an estimated $10,000–$15,000/year for smaller teams on a custom quote.

Read review Website
2

StandardFusion

Pick StandardFusion if you need a feature set closest to Drata—automated evidence collection, auditor portal, multi-framework control mapping—but want to evaluate an alternative before committing to Drata's opaque pricing.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Automated evidence collection from AWS, GCP, Azure, GitHub, GitLab, Okta, and Google Workspace covers the same core infrastructure stack as Drata without requiring custom connector work.
  • Pre-built control libraries for SOC 2 Type I, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 with cross-framework mapping reduce duplicated effort for companies pursuing both certifications simultaneously—matching Drata's core multi-framework value proposition.
  • Auditor collaboration portal gives external auditors structured, scoped access to evidence, compressing fieldwork back-and-forth in the same way Drata's Audit Hub does.

Trade-off

Pricing is fully opaque across all tiers—Starter, Professional, and Enterprise all require a sales call—so you cannot compare it against Drata on cost without running two parallel sales cycles.

Price

Quote-only across all tiers; no published entry price. Likely comparable to or slightly below Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year starting point, but unconfirmable without a demo.

Read review Website
3

SimpleRisk

Pick SimpleRisk if you need multi-framework GRC coverage (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF) across a technically capable team and want to avoid both per-seat pricing and Drata's opaque contract minimums.

From $5,000 / year 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Free open-source core with no seat limits removes the per-user cost pressure that makes Drata expensive as headcount scales; paid add-ons start at $5,000/year flat.
  • SCF integration covers 1,057 controls across 190 frameworks, enabling genuine multi-framework compliance without manual cross-referencing—a capability Drata charges a premium for.
  • Deployment flexibility (on-premise, self-hosted cloud, or SaaS) is rare at this price point and directly addresses data-residency or infrastructure-control requirements Drata cannot meet.

Trade-off

Native integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, and Google Workspace are not documented at the depth of Drata's 100+ connector library, meaning automated evidence collection likely requires manual work or custom development.

Price

Core is free (open-source); Starter Package at $5,000/year. Significantly cheaper than Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year entry point, but paid Extras tier is contact-sales only.

Read review Website
4

Reciprocity ZenGRC

Pick Reciprocity ZenGRC if you are a Series A or Series B company managing SOC 2 and ISO 27001 simultaneously and need a mature auditor portal plus first-class vendor risk management in a single platform.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Multi-framework control mapping lets teams satisfy SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls from a single control library, directly matching Drata's multi-framework value proposition for companies running both certifications.
  • Native auditor portal gives external audit firms structured read access to evidence and workflows, reducing fieldwork friction in the same way Drata's Auditor Portal does.
  • Vendor risk management is a first-class module with questionnaire distribution, response tracking, and risk linkage—comparable in depth to Drata's built-in VRM workflow.

Trade-off

Pricing is fully custom and enterprise-gated with no published tiers, and integration coverage for AWS, GitHub, Okta, and Google Workspace is not publicly documented—both require verification before signing.

Price

Contact-sales only; no published tiers. Signals enterprise positioning and likely a price point at or above Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year entry.

Read review Website
5

Ostendio MyVCM

Pick Ostendio MyVCM if you are an MSP or IT service provider that needs to manage SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance programs across multiple client accounts from a single multi-tenant platform.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial Risk Management

Why it fits

  • Multi-tenant architecture is purpose-built for MSPs managing compliance across multiple client accounts—a capability Drata does not offer and that eliminates the need for separate platform instances per client.
  • 300+ pre-built frameworks with cross-framework control mapping means a single piece of evidence can satisfy SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and others simultaneously, reducing duplicated effort at scale.
  • Task workflow engine with assignment, deadline tracking, and evidence collection automation addresses the coordination problem in audit prep across distributed teams or client engagements.

Trade-off

Architecture and pricing are optimized for MSPs and mid-market organizations; a single-entity startup will likely pay for multi-tenancy and framework breadth they will never use, and native integration depth with startup infrastructure is unconfirmed.

Price

Contact-sales only; no published tiers. Expect a multi-week sales cycle before receiving a quote, consistent with Drata's pricing model but without Drata's startup-specific positioning.

Read review Website
6

AuditBoard

Pick AuditBoard if you are a mid-market or enterprise organization running a formal internal audit program across SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOX simultaneously and need AI-powered autonomous testing rather than startup-focused evidence automation.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial Risk Management

Why it fits

  • Unified risk register and audit management backbone means controls tested once can satisfy SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOX simultaneously—a real efficiency gain for multi-framework programs that Drata's startup-centric design does not fully address at enterprise scale.
  • Autonomous testing capability executes control tests against connected data sources without manual intervention, enabling continuous monitoring that goes beyond Drata's integration-driven evidence collection.
  • GRC-trained AI for gap assessments is substantively more useful than generic LLM integrations, with context specific to audit and compliance workflows.

Trade-off

No published integration library for developer and infrastructure tooling (AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace); for a startup evaluating SOC 2 readiness, this is the most operationally critical unknown. Contact-sales-only pricing signals five-figure annual contracts at minimum.

Price

Contact-sales only; no public tiers. Almost certainly more expensive than Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year entry point and designed for enterprise budgets.

Read review Website
7

LogicGate Risk Cloud

Pick LogicGate Risk Cloud if you are a mid-market or enterprise GRC team that needs a no-code configurable platform with FAIR-methodology financial risk quantification and 200+ native integrations across a complex, multi-domain compliance program.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • No-code graph database with drag-and-drop workflow builder lets GRC teams model complex control and risk relationships without engineering support—more configurable than Drata's opinionated SOC 2 workflow.
  • Risk Cloud Quantify brings FAIR-methodology financial risk modeling natively into the platform, enabling board-level risk reporting that Drata does not offer.
  • 200+ native integrations across cloud, security, and HR platforms with a 96-day average implementation—broader integration surface than Drata for enterprise stacks.

Trade-off

Fully custom, opaque pricing with no published tiers and enterprise-grade implementation complexity make it a poor fit for sub-50-person startups; scope and overhead are mismatched for a single compliance framework.

Price

Custom Enterprise pricing only; no published tiers. Expect professional services costs on top of licensing, likely well above Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year entry point.

Read review Website
8

Resolver

Pick Resolver if you are a growth-stage or later-stage company with a dedicated compliance function pursuing SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and CMMC simultaneously and need integrated incident management and vendor risk under one platform.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Multi-framework coverage (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CMMC) in a single platform is meaningful if your compliance roadmap extends well beyond a first SOC 2—broader than Drata's primary framework focus.
  • Continuous control monitoring rather than point-in-time evidence collection strengthens Type II audit defensibility, matching Drata's core monitoring capability.
  • Sophisticated risk assessment and scoring with configurable models and risk-to-control mapping is genuinely useful for companies selling into regulated industries that scrutinize the risk program, not just the audit report.

Trade-off

All-custom enterprise pricing with no published tiers, and integration depth with developer-centric tools (GitHub, AWS, Okta, Google Workspace) is not confirmed—both are material unknowns for a startup evaluating this as a Drata replacement.

Price

Contact-sales only; no published tiers. Not a startup-tier product on price or process; expect costs at or above Drata's estimated entry point with a longer procurement cycle.

Read review Website
9

Onspring

Pick Onspring if you are pursuing FedRAMP authorization or selling into federal agencies and need a FedRAMP-authorized GRC platform with a dedicated POA&M management module alongside SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • FedRAMP authorization and dedicated POA&M Management module make it one of the few GRC platforms credibly suited to federal compliance programs—a requirement Drata cannot meet.
  • Low-code configuration layer allows compliance teams to build custom workflows without IT dependency, offering more flexibility than Drata's opinionated SOC 2 automation for organizations with non-standard processes.
  • Unified data model across risk, audit, policy, TPRM, and incident management eliminates cross-tool data fragmentation for organizations managing three or more frameworks simultaneously.

Trade-off

Native integration depth with common startup infrastructure (AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace) is not clearly documented, and fully custom pricing means a multi-week sales cycle before you have a number—both are real costs for time-constrained teams.

Price

Enterprise custom pricing only; no published tiers or entry-level anchors. Standard for enterprise GRC but a real procurement cost compared to Drata's already opaque pricing.

Read review Website
10

Aptien GRC

Pick Aptien GRC if you are an early-stage company under 50 people that needs to formalize operational compliance—training records, asset tracking, vendor management, policy acknowledgements—before a first audit and wants transparent, headcount-based pricing.

From $65 / month 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Transparent headcount-based pricing at $65–$350/month for teams up to 100 people makes the cost calculus simple and accessible—a direct contrast to Drata's fully opaque custom quotes.
  • Physical and operational asset management (equipment checkout, key tracking, facility management) goes well beyond what Drata offers, making it genuinely useful for hardware companies or asset-heavy organizations.
  • NIS2 compliance module provides structured support for European regulatory requirements that Drata and most US-centric GRC platforms ignore entirely.

Trade-off

No evidence of native integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Google Workspace; evidence collection for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audits will be largely manual, and risk and audit modules require significant DIY control mapping rather than pre-built SOC 2 libraries.

Price

$145/month (~$1,740/year) for up to 50 employees on the Intranet plan—a fraction of Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year entry point. Premium and Enterprise tier pricing for manager and specialist seats is quote-only.

Read review Website
11

Lockpath Keylight

Pick Lockpath Keylight (NAVEX One) if you are a mid-market compliance team of 200+ employees that needs to consolidate ethics training, whistleblowing, policy management, and risk governance onto one platform and SOC 2 or ISO 27001 is not your primary compliance goal.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Whistleblowing and hotline infrastructure backed by the largest incident management data repository in the market provides meaningful benchmarking for ethics and HR compliance programs that Drata does not address.
  • Single-platform consolidation across training, policy management, risk governance, and incident management reduces vendor sprawl for mature compliance teams managing obligations beyond security certifications.
  • Regulatory change management with real-time alerts is a genuine differentiator for organizations operating across multiple regulated jurisdictions.

Trade-off

SOC 2 Type I/II and ISO 27001:2022 are not called out as supported frameworks, and there are no documented native integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Google Workspace—making this a poor fit for any buyer whose primary goal is a security audit report.

Price

Fully custom pricing with no published tiers; expect enterprise contract minimums and a multi-week sales process. Not appropriate for startups on a budget or a timeline.

Read review Website

Verdict

Teams priced out of Drata or running multiple frameworks on a constrained budget should look at Eramba first—its $5,000/year flat fee with unlimited users and frameworks delivers the most cost-efficient path to a documented SOC 2 and ISO 27001 program, provided you have an engineer willing to own setup. Teams that need Drata's full feature set—continuous monitoring, 100+ native integrations, auditor portal, and minimal configuration overhead—and are at Series A or beyond should stay with Drata or evaluate StandardFusion as the closest like-for-like alternative.

Head-to-head with Drata

AuditBadger vs Drata: SOC 2 & ISO 27001 Platform Comparison for Startups Reciprocity ZenGRC vs Drata: GRC Platform Comparison for SOC 2 & ISO 27001

Questions people ask

Is there a cheaper alternative to Drata for SOC 2 compliance?
Yes. Eramba charges a flat $5,000/year for unlimited users and frameworks, compared to Drata's estimated $10,000–$15,000/year starting point on a custom quote. SimpleRisk also offers a free open-source core with paid add-ons from $5,000/year. The trade-off is that both require more manual setup and lack Drata's 100+ native evidence collection integrations.
Which Drata alternative publishes its pricing?
Eramba ($5,000/year flat for Enterprise; free Community edition), SimpleRisk ($5,000/year for Starter Package; free open-source core), and Aptien GRC ($65–$350/month depending on headcount) all publish transparent pricing. Every other candidate in this comparison—StandardFusion, ZenGRC, AuditBoard, LogicGate, Resolver, Onspring, Ostendio, and NAVEX One—is quote-only, like Drata.
What is the best Drata alternative for a startup under 20 employees?
Eramba is the strongest fit for a small startup: the Community edition is free, the Enterprise tier is $5,000/year flat with no seat limits, and it covers SOC 2 and ISO 27001 in a single platform. The caveat is that you'll need an engineer to configure evidence collection integrations manually, since Eramba lacks Drata's pre-built connectors for AWS, GitHub, and Okta.
Which Drata alternative is closest in features for SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001?
StandardFusion is the closest feature-for-feature alternative: it offers automated evidence collection from AWS, GCP, Azure, GitHub, Okta, and Google Workspace, pre-built control libraries for SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and an auditor collaboration portal. The main gap is that StandardFusion's pricing is also fully opaque, so you'll need to run a parallel sales process to compare costs.
Does any Drata alternative support on-premise deployment for data residency requirements?
Yes. Eramba and SimpleRisk both offer on-premise deployment options at no additional cost tier—a capability Drata's SaaS-only model cannot provide. This is particularly relevant for companies with contractual data-residency obligations or internal policies that prohibit sending compliance data to third-party cloud platforms.

Ranking is editorial, with promoted placement labelled and never changing the analysis (disclosure). How products are researched: methodology. Every vendor's published price: pricing index.