GRC Review
GRC Platform

Resolver alternatives for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 (compared)

Buyers looking past Resolver are typically smaller teams priced out of its enterprise-only sales process, or startups that need SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation without the configuration overhead of a platform built for dedicated GRC functions. Most end up choosing between a lightweight, flat-rate tool like AuditBadger or Eramba for cost and speed, or a mid-market platform like StandardFusion or Reciprocity ZenGRC when they need auditor-portal depth without full enterprise complexity.

Top pick: AuditBadger 9 alternatives ranked
GRC Review editorial desk · · AI-assisted draft, human-checked. Methodology

Why buyers look past Resolver

Reasons buyers switch

  • Quote-only pricing with no published tiers means buyers cannot evaluate cost without a multi-week sales cycle — a real barrier for founders who need a budget number before a board meeting or procurement approval.
  • No startup-native onboarding path; Resolver's configurability is designed for teams with a dedicated GRC function, adding significant ramp time for small teams without one.
  • Integration depth with developer-centric tools like GitHub, AWS, Okta, and Google Workspace is not confirmed in available product documentation, which is a critical gap for teams whose SOC 2 evidence collection depends on automated cloud connectors.
  • Resolver's broad feature surface — incident management, fraud investigation, business continuity, third-party risk — is more than most sub-100-person companies need for a first or second compliance certification, and paying for unused modules is a common complaint.
  • The platform's target market is explicitly enterprise and growth-stage organizations with a compliance team; seed and Series A companies are effectively priced and scoped out of the product.

What a replacement has to do

  • Published or at least predictable pricing so you can evaluate cost before committing to a sales process — quote-only models add weeks of procurement overhead.
  • Native automated evidence collection from the infrastructure your team actually uses: AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace — not just API access that requires custom development.
  • Pre-built control libraries for SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria and ISO 27001:2022 Annex A, with cross-mapping so evidence collected for one framework satisfies the other.
  • An auditor collaboration workflow — structured read access for external auditors — that reduces fieldwork friction without requiring manual evidence exports.
  • Onboarding speed and admin overhead appropriate for a lean team: ideally self-serve or guided setup measured in days to weeks, not months of professional services.

Where Resolver still fits best: Growth-stage or later-stage companies with a dedicated compliance or GRC function pursuing multiple frameworks simultaneously; Organizations selling into federal, financial services, or heavily regulated verticals where NIST CSF or CMMC compliance is required alongside SOC 2.

Ranked alternatives

1
AuditBadger

AuditBadger Top pick Promoted disclosure

Pick AuditBadger if you are a seed or Series A team that needs SOC 2 and ISO 27001 coverage fast, wants flat predictable pricing with no per-seat penalty, and values direct founder-led guidance over a self-serve knowledge base.

From $250 / month 4/5 editorial GRC & Compliance Management

Why it fits

  • Flat $250/month with unlimited users is the most transparent and predictable pricing model among all candidates — a 20-person team pays the same as a 2-person team, which Resolver cannot match at any disclosed price point.
  • SOC 2 and ISO 27001 share a single workspace with compounding evidence and policy mapping, avoiding the duplicate work that plagues multi-framework programs on heavier platforms.
  • One-week typical implementation and a shared Slack channel for ongoing guidance replaces the multi-week onboarding and support-queue model common at enterprise GRC tools.

Trade-off

Specific native integrations are not publicly enumerated — confirm your AWS, GitHub, and Okta stack is supported before committing, and note that as a newer vendor it won't match Resolver's enterprise feature depth for large, mature compliance programs.

Price

$250/month flat (published). Resolver is quote-only with no published tiers; AuditBadger is dramatically more affordable and budget-predictable for teams under 50 people.

Read review Website
2

Eramba

Pick Eramba if you have an engineer or security-minded founder willing to invest setup time and want the lowest total cost of ownership for a multi-framework GRC program covering SOC 2 and ISO 27001 simultaneously.

From €5,000 / year 4/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Flat $5,000/year Enterprise pricing with unlimited users, frameworks, and modules undercuts Resolver's enterprise pricing model significantly and eliminates per-seat scaling costs.
  • On-premise deployment option at no additional cost tier is rare at this price point and directly relevant for buyers with data-residency constraints that Resolver's cloud-only model cannot address.
  • Community edition is a fully functional free tier — not a trial — giving pre-audit teams a genuine zero-cost entry point to build their compliance program before committing to paid.

Trade-off

No native pre-built integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Google Workspace; automated evidence collection requires API work or custom automation, which adds engineering overhead that Resolver's enterprise customers typically absorb with dedicated staff.

Price

$5,000/year flat (published). Resolver is quote-only; Eramba's published price makes budget planning straightforward and is likely a fraction of Resolver's enterprise contract minimum.

Read review Website
3

StandardFusion

Pick StandardFusion if you are a Series A company pursuing SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 simultaneously and need documented native integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, and Google Workspace for automated evidence collection.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Documented native evidence collection from AWS, GCP, Azure, GitHub, GitLab, Okta, and Google Workspace — a concrete advantage over Resolver, whose integration depth with developer tools is unconfirmed.
  • Pre-built control libraries for SOC 2 Type I, Type II, and ISO 27001 with cross-framework mapping reduce duplicated evidence work for companies running both certifications at once.
  • Auditor collaboration portal gives external auditors structured, scoped access to evidence, reducing fieldwork friction without manual exports — comparable to Resolver's audit coordination portal.

Trade-off

Pricing is fully opaque across all tiers including Starter, requiring a sales cycle before you can compare it against Resolver or other alternatives on value — the same procurement friction you are trying to escape.

Price

Quote-only across all tiers (Starter, Professional, Enterprise). Comparable procurement friction to Resolver, but likely positioned below Resolver's enterprise contract floor for mid-market buyers.

Read review Website
4

Reciprocity ZenGRC

Pick Reciprocity ZenGRC if you are a Series A or Series B company managing SOC 2 and ISO 27001 simultaneously with a dedicated compliance function and a large vendor portfolio that needs first-class VRM alongside audit workflow.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Multi-framework control mapping lets teams satisfy SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls from a single control library, avoiding duplicated work — directly comparable to Resolver's multi-framework capability but with a more audit-focused workflow.
  • Native auditor portal gives external audit firms structured read access to evidence and workflows, reducing fieldwork friction without requiring manual evidence exports.
  • Vendor risk management is a first-class module with questionnaire distribution, response tracking, and control linkage — comparable to Resolver's vendor risk questionnaire library.

Trade-off

Pricing is fully custom and enterprise-gated with no published tiers, and integration coverage for AWS, GitHub, and Okta is not publicly documented — buyers face the same two friction points they are trying to escape from Resolver.

Price

Quote-only (published). Signals enterprise positioning; likely comparable to or above Resolver's price range for similar feature depth. Budget for a full sales cycle.

Read review Website
5

LogicGate Risk Cloud

Pick LogicGate Risk Cloud if you are a mid-market or enterprise organization with a dedicated GRC team that needs FAIR-methodology financial risk quantification and 200+ native integrations across cloud, security, and HR platforms.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • 200+ native integrations across cloud, security, and HR platforms is a documented advantage over Resolver, whose developer-tool integration depth is unconfirmed.
  • Risk Cloud Quantify brings FAIR-methodology financial risk modeling natively into the platform — a capability Resolver does not explicitly offer and one that matters for boards in regulated industries.
  • No-code graph database with agentic AI (Config Newton) enables rapid program configuration without IT dependency, potentially reducing the ramp time that makes Resolver challenging for lean teams.

Trade-off

Fully custom, opaque pricing with no published tiers and an enterprise-grade implementation timeline measured in weeks to months — the same procurement and onboarding friction as Resolver, without the benefit of Resolver's longer market track record.

Price

Quote-only (published). Enterprise contract minimums apply; expect professional services costs on top of licensing. Not meaningfully cheaper than Resolver for comparable feature scope.

Read review Website
6

Onspring

Pick Onspring if you are actively pursuing FedRAMP authorization or selling into federal agencies and need a FedRAMP-authorized GRC platform with a dedicated POA&M management module alongside SOC 2 and ISO 27001 workflows.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • FedRAMP authorization and dedicated POA&M Management module make it one of the few GRC platforms credibly suited to federal compliance programs — a concrete differentiator Resolver does not explicitly claim.
  • Low-code configuration layer allows compliance teams to build custom workflows without IT dependency, comparable to Resolver's configurability but with a documented no-code path.
  • Immutable audit trails on multi-level approval workflows provide defensible documentation for auditors without manual record-keeping — directly relevant for SOC 2 Type II defensibility.

Trade-off

Native integration depth with AWS, GitHub, Okta, and Google Workspace is not clearly documented, and pricing is fully custom with no published tiers — the same two watch-outs that apply to Resolver.

Price

Quote-only (published). Enterprise positioning with no published entry point; expect a multi-week sales and scoping process comparable to Resolver's procurement cycle.

Read review Website
7

SimpleRisk

Pick SimpleRisk if you have a technically capable team willing to self-host, need multi-framework coverage across 250+ frameworks including SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and want to avoid per-seat pricing at the lowest possible cost.

From $5,000 / year 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Free open-source core with no seat limits is a genuine zero-cost entry point — a stark contrast to Resolver's enterprise-only pricing model with no self-serve option.
  • SCF integration covers 1,057 controls across 190 frameworks, enabling multi-framework compliance without manual cross-referencing — broader framework coverage than Resolver's documented set.
  • Deployment flexibility (on-premise, self-hosted cloud, or SaaS) is rare at this price point and meaningful for teams with data residency requirements that Resolver's cloud-only model cannot address.

Trade-off

Self-hosted deployment shifts infrastructure and maintenance responsibility to your team, and native integrations with AWS, GitHub, and Okta are not documented at the depth of SaaS-native competitors — automated evidence collection will require manual work or custom development.

Price

Core is free (open-source); Starter Package at $5,000/year (published). Paid Extras tier is contact-sales only. Dramatically cheaper than Resolver at entry level, but total cost of ownership rises with engineering time for self-hosting.

Read review Website
8

Aptien GRC

Pick Aptien GRC if you are an asset-heavy or European company under 50 people that needs to formalize operational compliance — training records, asset tracking, vendor management, policy acknowledgements — before a first ISO 27001 audit, and NIS2 compliance is also in scope.

From $65 / month 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • NIS2 compliance module provides structured support for European regulatory requirements that Resolver and most US-centric GRC platforms do not address.
  • Physical and operational asset management — equipment checkout, key tracking, facility management — goes well beyond what Resolver or pure-play GRC tools offer, useful for hardware companies or asset-heavy organizations.
  • Transparent headcount-based pricing at $65–$350/month for teams up to 100 people makes cost evaluation simple — a direct contrast to Resolver's quote-only model.

Trade-off

No evidence of native integrations with AWS, GitHub, Okta, or Google Workspace; evidence collection for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audits will be largely manual, and risk and audit modules require significant DIY control mapping rather than pre-built SOC 2 or ISO 27001 libraries.

Price

$65/month for up to 20 employees, $145/month for up to 50 (published for Intranet tier). Premium and Enterprise GRC tiers are quote-only. Significantly cheaper than Resolver for small teams, but GRC-specific tier pricing requires a sales conversation.

Read review Website
9

Lockpath Keylight

Pick Lockpath Keylight (NAVEX One) if you are a mid-market compliance team of 200+ employees consolidating ethics training, whistleblowing, policy management, and risk governance onto one platform and SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification is not your primary compliance goal.

Quote-only pricing 3/5 editorial GRC Platform

Why it fits

  • Whistleblowing and hotline infrastructure backed by the largest incident management data repository in the market provides benchmarking capabilities Resolver does not offer.
  • Regulatory change management with real-time alerts is a genuine differentiator for organizations operating across multiple regulated jurisdictions — relevant for financial services or healthcare buyers.
  • 35+ years of compliance expertise embedded in policy templates and best practice libraries provides institutional knowledge useful for a first-time compliance officer building an ethics program from scratch.

Trade-off

SOC 2 Type I/II and ISO 27001:2022 are not called out as supported frameworks, and no native integrations with AWS, GitHub, or Okta are documented — making this a poor fit for any buyer whose primary goal is a security audit certification.

Price

Quote-only (published). Enterprise contract minimums apply with no self-serve tier; procurement friction is comparable to or greater than Resolver's. Not appropriate for startups on a budget or timeline.

Read review Website

Verdict

Teams switching from Resolver because of pricing opacity, onboarding overhead, or a mismatch with startup-scale needs should start with AuditBadger — its flat $250/month pricing, one-week implementation, and SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 dual-framework workspace address the three most common Resolver watch-outs directly; organizations that genuinely need Resolver's enterprise breadth — dedicated GRC staff, multiple frameworks, integrated incident and vendor risk management — should stay put and negotiate the contract rather than trade down.

Head-to-head with Resolver

AuditBadger vs Resolver: SOC 2 & ISO 27001 GRC Platform Comparison for Startups Reciprocity ZenGRC vs Resolver: GRC Platform Comparison for SOC 2 & ISO 27001

Questions people ask

Is there a cheaper alternative to Resolver for SOC 2 compliance?
Yes — AuditBadger at $250/month flat and Eramba at $5,000/year are both significantly more affordable than Resolver's enterprise-only, quote-only pricing. SimpleRisk also offers a free open-source core with no seat limits. All three cover SOC 2 and ISO 27001 without requiring a multi-week sales cycle to get a price.
Which Resolver alternative publishes its pricing?
AuditBadger ($250/month flat), Eramba ($5,000/year Enterprise), SimpleRisk ($5,000/year Starter), and Aptien GRC ($65–$350/month for teams up to 100) all publish entry-level pricing. StandardFusion, Reciprocity ZenGRC, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Onspring, and Lockpath Keylight are all quote-only, like Resolver.
What is the best Resolver alternative for a small startup doing its first SOC 2?
AuditBadger is the strongest fit for a seed or Series A startup: flat-rate pricing with unlimited users, a one-week implementation timeline, and SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 in a single workspace. Eramba is a close second if you have an engineer willing to handle self-directed setup in exchange for a lower annual cost.
Does any Resolver alternative support both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 in the same platform?
Several do: AuditBadger, Eramba, StandardFusion, Reciprocity ZenGRC, and SimpleRisk all support both frameworks with cross-mapped control libraries. AuditBadger and Eramba are notable for compounding evidence across both frameworks in a single workspace, reducing duplicate work for teams pursuing both certifications simultaneously.
Which Resolver alternative is best for a company that also needs FedRAMP or CMMC compliance?
Onspring is the strongest option for FedRAMP — it holds FedRAMP authorization and includes a dedicated POA&M management module. For CMMC alongside SOC 2, Eramba and SimpleRisk both cover CMMC in their framework libraries. Resolver itself supports NIST CSF and CMMC, so teams with a heavy federal compliance mandate should evaluate whether Resolver's breadth is actually worth the enterprise price before switching.

Ranking is editorial, with promoted placement labelled and never changing the analysis (disclosure). How products are researched: methodology. Every vendor's published price: pricing index.